Disposed

Munshi Lal and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC8 Nov 2023A482/41422/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings was disposed of as merit was not pressed. The court directed a surrender within three weeks and expeditious bail hearing per Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Application for quashing refused; directors to surrender within three weeks and for expeditious bail decision; no coercive action for three weeks.

Munshi Lal and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:214879

¶2

Court No. - 89

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41422 of 2023 Applicant :- Munshi Lal And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the cognizance/summoning order dated 06.12.2021 as well as entire proceeding of Sessions Trial No.1183 of 2021 arising out of Case Crime No.78 of 2021 (State vs. Lakshmi Narayan and others), under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 452, 342, 325, 308 I.P.C., P.S. Kalwari, District Basti, pending in the court of Special Judge (SC/ST Act) Basti.

¶7

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.

¶9

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that applicants shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case apply for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶11

For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶12

With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of.

¶13

Order Date :- 8.11.2023

¶14

SKD

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Munshi Lal and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munshi Lal and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajnish Pal @ Tilka Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Smt. Neeti Raijada @ Renu and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pragya Patel Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Tugyan and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shiv Kumar and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Jamanadas and 6 Othrs Vs State of U.P. and Another