This court disposed of an application seeking to quash a summoning order under Section 482 Cr.P.C. held that applicant's contentions regarding the sale of land without title were mere civil defenses unsuitable for consideration in criminal proceedings, dismissing the application as devoid of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:228150
Court No. - 90
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40949 of 2023 Applicant :- Kalawati Devi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gyanu Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 2.12.2023 Shafique
(Vinod Diwakar, J.)
Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a criminal application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can countenance civil defenses where a related civil suit is pending.
Whether the sale of excess land without title, for which defense was raised, justifies quashing of the summoning order under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kalawati Devi And Another
State of U.P.
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
