Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings was not pressed on merit; instead, court directed speedy bail decision and surrender within three weeks without coercive action.
Quash prayer refused; Surrender directed within 3 weeks; Bail to be decided expeditiously; No coercive action for 3 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:212228
Court No. - 89
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40907 of 2023
Applicant :- Mohd. Umar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Nitin Verma
Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to quash the criminal proceedings under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 308 IPC.
Whether the alternate prayer for expeditious decision on bail may be granted.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationReferred¶11
2021 SCC OnLine SC 922 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Umar And Another
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
