Amit Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel for the applicant did not wish to press Section 482 CrPC application, resulting in dismissal without orders on merits.
Counsel for the applicant did not wish to press Section 482 CrPC application, resulting in dismissal without orders on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40421 of 2022
Applicant :- Amit Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Singh,Pradeep Singh Sengar
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
At the very outset learned AGA has raised preliminary objection on the maintainability of this application and states that against the impugned order a revision lies, not an application under Section 482 CrPC.
Confronted with the above, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not wish to press this application with liberty to file a revision/recall application.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty aforesaid.
Order Date :- 1.2.2023 Shahroz
Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
AMIT KUMAR
UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court