Disposed

Narandra Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC2 Nov 2023A482/40380/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court refused the applicant's application to quash proceedings on merit. The court directed the applicant to surrender within three weeks, ensuring no coercive action is taken. It mandated expedited decision on bail in accordance with Satender Kumar Antil principles.

What did the court decide?

Refusal of quashing application; direction to surrender within three weeks; directive for expedited bail consideration.

Narandra Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:210047

¶2

Court No. - 89

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40380 of 2023 Applicant :- Narandra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Mishra,Harish Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the impugned charge-sheet No.303 of 2018 dated 29.08.2018, cognizance/summoning order dated 18.04.2019 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Rampur as well as entire proceeding of Case No.753 of 2019 arising out of Case Crime No.448 of 2018 (State vs. Narendra Singh), under Sections 420, 406 I.P.C., P.S. Ganj, District Rampur, pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rampur.

¶6

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶8

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶9

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that applicant shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶10

For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶11

With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 2.11.2023

¶13

SKD

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Narandra Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narandra Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pooran Singh and 12 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Lokendra Kumar and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jitendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mahedra Pal Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Amit Kumar Sanghai Vs State of U.P.and Another

Rachna Vs State of U.P. and Another