Court dismissed the interim maintenance application under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous because the main application under Section 125 CrPC was finally decided.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39785 of 2022
Applicant :- Nityanand Srivastava Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Karunesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjeev Kumar
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
Heard Sri Karunesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Sri Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and perused the record.
By this application an interim order regarding interim maintenance has been challenged.
Learned counsel for the applicant informs that the application under Section 125 CrPC has been finally decided by the concerned court. Hence, this application has become infructuous.
In view of the statement of the learned counsel for the applicant this application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.2.2023 Shahroz
Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nityanand Srivastava
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
