Achhu @ Achhu Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
On an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR, the Single Judge held that the applicant was a minor at the time of the impugned order, was not represented, and the matter was disposed of by the PS in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling requiring consideration of these facts before an order under Section 482 can be made. The application for condonation of delay was also
What did the court decide?
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed.