Disposed

Vipin Chandra Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC12 Oct 2023A482/37823/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court refused the applicant's substantive prayer to quash criminal proceedings but granted an alternative prayer. Applicants are directed to surrender within three weeks, with bail applications to be decided expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Applicants directed to surrender within three weeks; bail applications to be expeditiously decided by lower courts.

Vipin Chandra Yadav and 2 Others Vs State… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:196778

¶2

Court No. - 89

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37823 of 2023 Applicant :- Vipin Chandra Yadav And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Navneet Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 05.03.2023, summoning order dated 08.08.2023, as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.45420 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No.15 of 2023, under Sections, 323, 324, 504, 427, 308, 325 I.P.C., P.S. Jangipur, District Ghazipur, pending in the Court of Addl. Civil Judge (JD)/JM, Room No.05, Ghazipur.

¶7

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.

¶9

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that applicants shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶11

For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶12

With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of.

¶13

Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Nitin Verma

¶14

Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vipin Chandra Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vipin Chandra Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Rajput and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shiva @ Shivendra Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vishnu Thakur Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Jagdish @ Tinchu Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ajay Kumar Sharma Vs State of U.P. and Another

Gaurav Rai Vs State of U.P. and Another