Disposed

Ram Karan Mishra and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC19 Jan 2023A482/37754/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicants withdrew prayer for quashing criminal proceedings and sought to file a bail application. Bench permitted them to move bail within four weeks and restrained coercive action during that period.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action against applicants for four weeks to enable them to file a bail application followed Satendra Kumar Antil guidelines.

Ram Karan Mishra and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Court No. - 72

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37754 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Ram Karan Mishra And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Prakash Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 3251 of 2018 (State vs. Ram Karan Mishra and others) as well as chargesheet dated 17.04.2018 including cognizance order dated 18.05.2018, arising out of Case Crime No. 24 of 2018, under Sections 323, 452, 504, 506 IPC against the applicant nos. 1 and 2 and Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC against the applicant nos. 3 and 4, Police Station- Jogiya Udaipur, District- Siddharth Nagar, pending in the Court of Judicial magistrate, Siddharth Nagar.

¶7

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants relinquish the prayer for quashment and wish to move bail application before the trial court in view of the guidelines / observations given by Hon'ble The Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in ( 2021) 10 SCC 773.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection.

¶9

Considering the above submissions and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in case the applicants appear before the court concerned within four weeks from today and move application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of in terms of the guidelines / observations given by Hon'ble The Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) .

¶10

For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

¶11

It is made clear that in the event no such application is moved within the time prescribed above, this order will be of no avail to the applicants.

¶12

With the above direction, the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of.

¶13

Order Date :- 19.1.2023 A. Sharma

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ANJALI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Karan Mishra and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Karan Mishra and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Sharma Vs State of U.P and Another

Gulfam Ali Vs State of Up and Another

Ram Sewak and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sandeep Saroj and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Anil Kumar Pandey Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pawan Verma Vs State of U.P. and Another