Bablu and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Apex Court had been directed to decide bail expeditiously, and no coercive action until surrender. The application was disposed of with directions to surrender within three weeks and for urgent bail consideration.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:208117
Court No. - 89
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33237 of 2023
Applicant :- Bablu And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Kumar Pandey,Kamini Pandey (Dubey) Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Garun Pal Singh
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.
- This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the summoning order dated 03.09.2022 as well as further proceedings of Complaint Case No. 0152 of 2017 (Smt. Sakina vs. Bablu and 4 Others) wherein summoned the applicant no. 1, Bablu under Sections 323, 354, 452, 504 IPC & Section 7/8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and summoned the applicant no. 2 to 5, under Sections 323, 504, 506 of IPC & Section 7/8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station- Sadar Bazer, DistrictMathura, pending in the court of Additional Session Judge/Additional Special Judge, POCSO Act.
- On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bablu And 4 Others
Coram
Deepak Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/33237/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court