The application challenged the order framing charges alleging misalignment with FIR and 161 Cr.P.C. statements. The court held the order showed non-application of judicial mind and quashed it.
The order framing charges was quashed and the applicant was directed to frame appropriate charges within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:189943
Court No. - 89
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32217 of 2023
Applicant :- Ravikulbhushan Dayal And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Imran Syed,Tarun Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 3.10.2023 Meenu Singh
Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order framing charges under Section 498-A IPC applied judicial mind and was consistent with facts and FIR.
Whether the application for quashing the summoning order and charging order deserves to be allowed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ravikulbhushan Dayal and Others
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
