Disposed

Manvendra Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC25 Aug 2023A482/31419/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court refused the applicant's plea to quash FIR, charge sheet, and cognizance order citing lack of merit. Instead, an order was passed directing surrender within three weeks and expeditious disposal of the bail application.

What did the court decide?

Relief sought under S. 482 Cr.P.C. refused; applicant directed to surrender within 3 weeks and courts below to decide bail expeditiously.

Manvendra Kumar Sharma Vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:172338

¶2

Court No. - 89

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 31419 of 2023 Applicant :- Manvendra Kumar Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhaskar Bhadra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 06.08.2021; cognizance order dated 25.03.2022 as well as entire proceedings of Crl. Case No.419 of 2022 (State Vs. Manvendra Kumar Sharma), Case Crime No. 279 of 2021, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 I.P.C., P.S. Baradari, District Bareilly, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Ist, Bareilly.

¶7

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that applicant shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶11

For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶12

With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of.

¶13

Order Date :- 25.8.2023 Meenu Singh

¶14

Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manvendra Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manvendra Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Murari Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Sanjiv Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sunil Kumar @ Sonu Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vikas Verma Vs State of U.P. and Another

Nitin Kumar Chaturvedi Vs State of U.P. and Another

Deep Chand Yadav and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another