Disposed

Raj Kishor Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC12 Oct 2023A482/26487/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the applicant's Section 482 Cr.P.C. application refusing to grant relief as the applicant is on bail and moving a discharge application. The court directed the trial court to decide the future discharge application by speaking order at the appropriate stage.

What did the court decide?

Relief sought in the instant application refused; direction given for speaking order on future discharge application.

Raj Kishor Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:197120

¶2

Court No. - 88

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26487 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Raj Kishor Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Subhash Chandra Tiwari,Amit Tiwari,Devbrat Dwivedi

¶5

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/opposite party no.1 and perused the record.

¶8

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the charge-sheet dated 23.02.2023, summoning order dated 15.03.2023 and proceedings of case no. 786 of 2023 (State vs. Shyamu and others) arising out of case crime no. 05 of 2023, under Section 3 RP (U.P.) Act and Section 147 of Railway Act, Outpost R.P.F., Kanpur Central, District Kanpur Nagar pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway), Allahabad.

¶9

After advancing some argument at length and putting certain query by the Court, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that since the applicant is already on bail in this case, therefore, he may be permitted to move a discharge application before the court concerned raising his objections. Learned counsel for the applicant also submits that moving a discharge application before the concerned trial Court is a legal / statutory right of the accused, therefore he is not pressing any further relief as claimed by applicant by means of this application at this stage.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. submits that in case the applicant is not pressing the relief as sought for by him on merits and wants to move discharge application, he has no objection.

¶11

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant in the instant application is refused.

¶12

However considering the above alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that in case the discharge application is moved by the applicant before the court concerned at the appropriate stage, the same shall be decided by the court concerned by speaking order in accordance with law.

¶13

With the aforesaid observations and direction, the application is disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Saurabh

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Raj Kishor Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kishor Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Verma @ Gaurav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Om Pakash Mishra and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rasheed Ahmad and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ankit and 3 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Another

Uma Shankar @ Bittu Vs State of U.P. and Another

Reeta Mishra and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another