Disposed
Shah Alam v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Allahabad HCA482/23050/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. - 2023:AHC:137301 Court No. - 91 Case :-…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. - 2023:AHC:137301 Court No. - 91 Case :-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:137301
Court No. - 91
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23050 of 2023
Applicant :- Shah Alam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Prakash,Dinesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to quash the coercive process against the applicant in pursuance of F.I.R. dated 28.07.2022 registered as Case Crime No.0103 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 419, 420, 467, 468 IPC, Police Station Sinduriya, District Maharajganj.
After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of this application with liberty to the applicants to file bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to such request.
In view of the above, the instant application is disposed of with liberty to the applicants to appear before court concerned and file appropriate application for bail, which shall be decided in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No (s) 5191 of 2021 , decided on 07.10.2021 .
Order Date :- 12.7.2023 Sanjeet
Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶10
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No (s) 5191 of 2021, decided on 07.10.2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shah Alam
State Of U.P.
Gajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court