In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging a charge sheet and cognizance order, the High Court allowed the withdrawal of the application with liberty to file a bail application, citing Satender Kumar Antil.
Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:126272
Court No. - 75
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 21182 of 2023
Applicant :- Indal Prasad Maurya And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pusp Raj Singh,Rajesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 12.6.2023 Gaurav
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow withdrawal of application challenging charge sheet and cognizance order under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on¶10
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Indal Prasad Maurya And Another
Rajeev Misra
Gaurav Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
