No one appeared for the applicant. The learned counsel for the respondent was present. The Vakalatnama filed by the respondent counsel was not on record and directed to be traced. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:123582
Court No. - 82
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 20962 of 2023
Applicant :- Nipun Bahri Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Varun Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Akhilanand Mishra,Amit Kumar,Renu Rajat Alias Renu Sahai
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Order Date :- 2.6.2023 AS Rathore
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nipun Bahri
State Of U.P.
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
