The applicant sought to quash a summoning order in a criminal complaint. The court refused to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., granting liberty to move a discharge application before the trial court within 30 days, and disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:123095
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 20783 of 2023
Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Order Date :- 1.6.2023 Rohit
Digitally signed by :- ROHIT DAS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the summoning order against the applicant under various IPC sections should be quashed?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajesh Kumar Singh
State of U.P.
Shyam Varan Singh
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
