In the application for maintenance, after giving proper opportunity to the opposite party no.2, the concerned Court vide order dated 21.04.2016 directed the opposite party no.2 to pay maintenance of Rs.3,000/- per month to the applicant from the date of order. Despite the aforesaid order, when a single penny was not paid by the opposite party no.2, the applicant filed an application under Section 125(3) Cr.P.C. and Court concerned vide order dated 22.12.2020 issued a recovery warrant of Rs.1,56,000/- and non bailable warrant against opposite party no.2. After about five years of the order dated 21.04.2016, the opposite party no.2 filed an application under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. for recalling the orders dated 21.04.2016 as well as 30.05.2016 as mentioned in the application. On the aforesaid application, order dated 15.03.2021 was passed directing the opposite party no.2 to pay Rs.40,000/- to the applicant as penalty as well as the entire arrears, as a condition to restore the original case to its original number. Pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 15.03.2021, the opposite party no.2 has only paid Rs.39,000/- to the applicant and the Court below on the application of opposite party no.2 has passed order dated 30.09.2021 stating therein that the execution proceedings initiated
