Single-paragraph order dismissing a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application due to the non-appearance of the applicant's counsel, vacating an interim order and directing the police to proceed with the complaint.
Application dismissed; interim order of 26.05.2014 vacated; trial to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18942 of 2014
Applicant :- Shashi Prakash And 4 Ors Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Kakran Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,A.K.S. Bais
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None is present on behalf of learned counsel for the applicants to press the instant application. However, learned AGA for the State is present.
Accordingly, it is dismissed and interim order dated 26.05.2014 stands vacated.
Inform Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- III to proceed with the Complaint Case No. 3057 of 2013 (Satya Pal Singh Vs. Shashi Prakash and others) under Sections 323, 452, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Gangoh, District- Saharanpur.
Order Date :- 24.2.2023 Mohini
Digitally signed by :- MOHINI RAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed in the absence of the applicant's counsel.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shashi Prakash And 4 Ors
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
