No substantive summary available as the application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:126847
Court No. - 75
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17160 of 2023
Applicant :- Satya Prakash Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar,Pradyumna Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in revised list.
No one appears on behalf of applicant to press this application.
Learned A.G.A. for State is present.
As no one appears on behalf of applicant to press this application, it is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 15.6.2023 Arshad
Digitally signed by :- ARSHAD MAHMOOD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Satya Prakash
State of U.P.
H.R.L. Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
