Nanka v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the application under Section 482 CrPC u/s 482 CrPC as the file was untraced, no one appeared, and necessary documents were unavailable.
What did the court decide?
Stringent measures applied: order dated 16.10.2023, file consigned to records.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:199519
Court No. - 69
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15986 of 1988
Applicant :- Nanka Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- G.S. Bhatt,Rajiv Joshi,S.K. Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.,G.P.Dixit
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
- List revised.
- No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list despite the fact that there are three learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri G.P. Dixit, learned counsel for the private respondent is also not present.
- Sri Bare Lal Bind, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
- As per the report of office dated 19.09.2023, the file of the matter could not be traced in the office and then intimation was sent to the office of the learned Advocate General to provide a copy of the present matter which was also not available from his office. A publication of notice was done calling upon learned counsel(s) for the applicant to provide the required documents but there is no response to the same. The report dated 19.09.2023 of the office is a detailed report enumerating the above events.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Nanka
Coram
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/15986/1988
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court