The High Court allowed an application under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings due to a cognizance order passed without application of mind on a cyclostyled copy. The matter was remanded for a fresh order.
The cognizance order dated 23.1.2018 and proceedings were set aside, and the matter was remanded for a fresh order within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:149080
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14895 of 2023
Applicant :- Madan Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Uma Dutt Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Baleshwar Chaturvedi,Niraj Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
repelled by this Court in various judgments.
Order Date :- 26.7.2023 Junaid
Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an impugned cognizance order passed based on a cyclostyled copy and without application of mind should be set aside.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Megh Nath Gupta & another Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2008 (62) ACC 826Referred¶8
Megh Nath Gupta & another Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2008 (62) ACC 826
Ankit Vs. State of U.P. and another [(2009) (9) ADJ 778]Referred¶8
Ankit Vs. State of U.P. and another [(2009) (9) ADJ 778]
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madan Singh
State Of U.P.
Neeraj Tiwari
Junaid Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
