Dismissed

Jalim Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC24 Apr 2023A482/14440/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking directions to expedite the trial of a cheque-bounce case. The judge held that no specific reasons for expediting were made out, directing the applicant to approach the trial court instead.

What did the court decide?

No direction to expedite was passed; applicant directed to file an application before the trial court.

Jalim Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 71 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14440 of 2023 Applicant :- Jalim Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶3

List revised.

¶4

Heard Shri Narendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶5

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant–Jalim Singh with the prayer to direct the Presiding Officer to decide the Case No. 11547 of 2019 (Jalim Singh Vs. M/S Chaudhary Builders), u/s 138 N.I. Act, P.S. Shahganj, District Agra pending in the court of Addl. Court No. 1, Agra within specific period as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is the informant of the case. It is argued that the trial is lingering on just because of non cooperation of the accused persons and, as such, appropriate direction be issued for disposal of trial in time bound manner.

¶7

Per contra, learned State counsel opposed the prayer made in the present matter by arguing that no such specific reasons have been made out for giving any direction for expediting the trial of the case and as such the application be dismissed.

¶8

After having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the records, it is evident that there is no specific reason for expediting the same. However, the applicant (s) may file an application for expediting the trial before the court concerned within two weeks from today which may as per its load of work, diary and pendency of cases, pass appropriate orders on the same within two weeks, if there is no legal impediment.

¶9

It is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction for expediting the trial.

¶10

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of.

¶11

(Samit Gopal, J.)

¶12

Order Date :- 24.4.2023 Gaurav

¶13

Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jalim Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jalim Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yasir Ali and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vikas and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Harshankar and 10 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Raj Kapoor Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Iqpal and 13 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Hari Pratap and 3 Others Vs State of U.P.and Another