Shobhit Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
No. - 2023:AHC:102081 Court No. - 68 Case :-…
No. - 2023:AHC:102081 Court No. - 68 Case :-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:102081
Court No. - 68
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13261 of 2022
Applicant :- Shobhit Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Kant Dubey,Santosh Kumar Dubey
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the order dated 18.04.2022 passed by Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C./Judicial Magistrate Hapur in Complaint Case No.966 of 2021 (Tarun Gera Vs. Shobhit and others), under Sections 467, 469 I.P.C., Police Station-Hapur Nagar, District-Hapur, pending in the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C./Judicial Magistrate Hapur.
At the outset learned counsel for the applicant gave up his challenge to the aforesaid prayer and confined his submission, requesting that a direction may be issued to the concerned court below to decide the application dated 19.04.2022, for bringing certain documents on record, within stipulated period.
Learned A.G.A. has pointed out that the application so filed by learned counsel for the applicants is not maintainable, therefore, the relief as prayed cannot be granted.
Accordingly, the same is rejected as not maintainable.
Order Date :- 11.5.2023 Rahul.
Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shobhit Kumar
Other Applicant
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court