Vinod @ Sonu v. State of U.P and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear before the court to press the matter.
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear before the court to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 68
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10378 of 2022
Applicant :- Vinod @ Sonu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Shiromani Yadav,Bharat Garg Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appeared to press this application on behalf of the applicant. Learned AGA for the State is present.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 3.1.2023 RavindraKSingh
Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinod @ Sonu
State Of U.P
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Ravindra Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court