No appearance by the petitioner in a writ petition under Article 227; respondents were present. The petition was dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:237087
Court No. - 44
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8611 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Respondent :- Smt. Sangeeta Devi And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajnish Dubey,Bhuwan Raj,Kriti Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Rajesh Kumar Kanojia
Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. However, Sri Rajesh Kumar Kanojia, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in default .
Order Date :- 14.12.2023 v.k.updh.
Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramesh Chandra
Smt. Sangeeta Devi
Another
Ashutosh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
