Petitioner filed a writ under Article 226. Counsel submitted the petition became infructuous by efflux of time. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8199 of 2017
Petitioner :- Pradeep Shukla Respondent :- Central Bureau Of Investigation New Delhi Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudeep Harkauli Counsel for Respondent :- Amit Misra,Gyan Prakash
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous . Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 15.2.2023 Rao/-
Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pradeep Shukla
Central Bureau Of Investigation New Delhi
CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
