In a petition under Article 227 regarding a 23-year-old civil suit for permanent injunction, the Court declined to issue specific time-bound directions but directed the Trial Court to ensure the case concludes without unnecessary adjournments.
Direction issued to the Trial Court to ensure proceedings conclude without unnecessary adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:172949
Court No. - 1
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7339 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ram Shingar Respondent :- Surendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Petitioner :- Ghazala Bano Quadri
Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
"A) to issue a order or direction to the Trial Court to decide the Case No. 108/2000 (Ram Shingar Versus Surendra Bahadur Singh) pending before the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Mirzapur within a stipulated time period (Annexure No.1 of this writ petition).
B) to issue a order or direction to the respondent not to interfere in peaceful possession of the petitioner."
Order Date :- 28.8.2023 K.K.Tiwari
(Jayant Banerji, J.)
Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should issue specific directions to the Trial Court to decide a more than 23-year-old civil suit.
Whether the High Court can restrain the respondent from interfering in the petitioner's peaceful possession.
Whether the Trial Court should ensure proceedings in long-pending suits conclude without unnecessary adjournments.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Shingar
Surendra Bahadur Singh
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
