In a matter under Article 227 where the petitioner appeared non-prosecuting, the Court noticed the absence of counsel to press the petition and dismissed it on this ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:169625
Court No. - 1
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5709 of 2023
Petitioner :- Laxmidutta Tiwari Respondent :- Smt. Mannadevi And 24 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Kumar Sharma
Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
List has been revised. No one appears for the petitioner to press this petition.
A perusal of the order-sheet reveals that time for filing a supplementary affidavit was granted by this Court on 17.05.2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner was also required to file certain documents as is reflected in the next order of 14.07.2023. The case was adjourned on 07.08.2023 on the request made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Today, when the matter is taken up in the revised turn, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to press this petition.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.8.2023 SK
(Jayant Banerji, J.)
Digitally signed by :- SUSHEEL KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Laxmidutta Tiwari
Smt. Mannadevi
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
