The petitioner withdrew the matter under Article 227. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and discharged any interim orders.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:170257
Court No. - 79
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3969 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ankur Chilwal Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Nitin Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Criminal Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 2 of 2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press this petition and it may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 23.8.2023 sailesh
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ankur Chilwal
State of U.P.
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
