The petitioner challenged an order directing further investigation under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. via a petition under Article 227. The High Court held the petition lacked merit as the investigation was ongoing and no prima facie grievance existed, dismissing the petition.
Petition dismissed for lack of merit
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:193960
Court No. - 81
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3429 of 2023 Petitioner :- Parvej Ilahi @ Kaushar Afridi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kr. Srivastava,Om Prakash Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Order Date :- 9.10.2023/Sumit Kumar
Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court's supervisory power under Article 227 requires interference with an order directing further investigation under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. when the investigation is still pending an
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Parvej Ilahi @ Kaushar Afridi
State Of U.P.
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
