This petition for writ jurisdiction under Article 227 was dismissed because the underlying petition had become infructuous following the arguments of counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 50
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3396 of 2021
Petitioner :- Smt. Kamla Devi And Another Respondent :- Smt. Priya Alias Dolly And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bipin Lal Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Awadhesh Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
Shri Suyash Bhargav, Advocate, holding brief of Shri Bipin Lal Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners appeared and prayed for disposal of present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, as the same has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as being infructuous, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioners.
Order Date :- 19.1.2023 Nitika
Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Kamla Devi
Another
Smt. Priya Alias Dolly
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
Nitika Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
