Disposed

Haseeb v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC11 Oct 2023/9945/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An applicant sought quashing of a summons and charge sheet alleging false implication under Sections 379, 411 IPC. The court set aside the application, granting liberty to file a bail petition which shall be disposed expeditiously in accordance with Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file bail application within two weeks for expeditious disposal per Satender Kumar Antil; matter disposed of.

Haseeb Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. and Another — Allahabad HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:66390

¶2

Court No. - 28

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9945 of 2023 Applicant :- Haseeb Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.

¶6

Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with prayer quashing of the impugned summoning order dated 18.08.2023 Passed by learned Civil Judge (J. D.) Court No. 43 Barabanki, and impugned charge sheet dated 12.12.2022, in Case No.552 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No.288 of 2022, under Sections 379, 411 I.P.C. & 4/10 of Forest Act, Police station Ghunghter District Barabanki, as well as for staying the entire proceedings arising out of the aforesaid case crime number.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.

¶8

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51 .

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶11

The application is disposed of accordingly.

¶12

Order Date :- 11.10.2023/Manoj K.

¶13

Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Haseeb v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Haseeb v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Vizh Vs State of U.P. and Ors.

Munnar Yadav @ Mundar Yadav and Anr. Vs the State of U.P Thru Principal Secy. Home Lucknow and Anr.

Smt. Chhaya Verma Vs the State of U.P and Anr.

Naheed Rizvi and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, U.P. Lucknow and 2 Others

Ram Veer Purohit Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Home U.P. Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko

Neeraj Kumar and Anr. Vs the State of U.P and Ors.