Sushila v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This order disposed of a writ petition where the respondent accepted ACP benefits for the petitioner earlier. The court directed the first respondent to ensure payment of these benefits within three months.
What did the court decide?
Respondent No. 1 directed to ensure payment of ACP benefits to the petitioner within three months of the order.