Allowed

Vikas Singh @ Pappu Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC31 May 2023/7255/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed bail to the applicant in a case registered under the UP Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, subject to conditions including furnishing a personal bond and sureties, attendance at court, and no involvement in unlawful activities.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail subject to personal bond, two sureties, and conditions of not tampering with evidence or indulging in unlawful activities.

Vikas Singh @ Pappu Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:39258

¶2

Court No. - 31

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7255 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Vikas Singh @ Pappu Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Singh,Prashansa Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State respondent and perused the record.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that only one case has been shown against the applicant in the gang-chart and in that case, the applicant is on bail. Copy of bail order is annexed as Annexure No. 3 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. It has also been submitted that the applicant is not involved in any antisocial activities and he has been falsely implicated in the present crime. The copy of the gangchart has been annexed as Annexure no. 2 to the affidavit. It is further submitted that there is no chance of the applicant fleeing away from the judicial process or of tampering with the prosecution evidence. He next submits that the applicant is in jail since 30.03.2018 and if he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer of bail. However, he does not dispute the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the case mentioned in the gang-chart.

¶9

Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon the perusal of the record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let applicant Vikas Singh @ Pappu Singh be released on bail in Case Crime No. 167 of 2018, under Section 2/3 UP Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Akhand Nagar, District Sultanpur on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶11

(i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence in any manner whatsoever.

¶12

(ii) The applicant will abide by the orders of the court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶13

(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activity.

¶14

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.

¶15

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶16

Order Date :- 31.5.2023

¶17

sailesh

¶18

Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vikas Singh @ Pappu Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Singh @ Pappu Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Nirmala Tripathi Vs the State of U.P and Anr.

Vivek @ Rahul Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Ravi Dixit @ Shubham Dixit Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Sectt. U.P Govt. Lko

Raju Alias Allimulla and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Dept. Lko. and Another

Baboo @ Dilshad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.

Ashu @ Ashutosh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.