Disposed

Sanjay Kumar and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home and Another

Allahabad HC11 Jul 2023/6480/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of bail application by permitting applicants to move charge-sheet quashing or discharge application through counsel within four weeks, directing expeditious disposal of such future applications.

What did the court decide?

Applicants permitted to move discharge application through counsel within four weeks; no coercive steps till then.

Sanjay Kumar and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 12

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6480 of 2023

¶3

Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home And Another

¶4

Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Mishra,Chhaya Tripathi

¶5

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶6

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶7

Heard, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶8

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of Case Crime No.141 of 2019 u/s 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Harchandpur, DistrictRaebareli pending in the court of A.C.J.M., I, Court No.11, Raebareli and to quash the impugned charge-sheet no.190 of 2019 dated 20.08.2019.

¶9

After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submit that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

¶11

In view of above, it is provided that applicants permitted to move their discharge application(s) through counsel within four weeks' from today and in case any such application(s) are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order.

¶12

Till the aforesaid period of four weeks' and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶13

In case of failure on the part of applicants in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, they will not be entitled to the benefit of this order.

¶14

With above directions, this application stands disposed of .

¶15

Order Date :- 11.7.2023 Arpan

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sanjay Kumar and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anwari and Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Sita Singh Vs the State of U.P and Anr.

James Illoduba Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home. Deptt. and Others

Pradip Kumar Yadav @ Pradip Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Ramesh Chandra @ Ramesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Home Secy. Lko. and 2 Others

Shyam Bahadur and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Anothers