considering the statement of co-accused, Seema, wherein she admits that all the three accused including the appellant were actively involved in the murder of the deceased, co-accused Seema has herself stated regarding circumstances which arise murder of the deceased that deceased was in love affair with her, thereafter physical relations were developed between them which remained continued for several years, which fact was also came into knowledge of in-laws of Seema and also to other villagers, on account of which image of Seema was defaming, therefore she made conspiracy and committed the murder of the deceased with the help of appellant and other co-accused, Bhanu Yadav, who are her real brothers, thus, there is strong evidence indicating the involvement of the appellant in the crime, therefore, chain of circumstances is complete and is connecting the appellant in commission of murder of the deceased in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharshtra : 1984 Cri. L.J. 178. Thus, it cannot be said that it is a case of circumstantial evidence. The prosecution has completed the chain of evidence indicating involvement of appellant in the crime. Therefore appellant's involvement is very much connected in the murder of the deceased. I find no good ground to enlarge the applicant on bail.
