opposite party No.1 and his family members, which came to be allowed and the first information report came to be lodged against the opposite party No.1 and his family members and the case under Section 498A I.P.C. and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act is still pending. The revisionist being unable to maintain herself moved an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. on 02.07.2010, which is pending in the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Faizabad as Case No.154 of 2010 titled as Ruby Singh vs. Veer Pratap Singh. The opposite party No.1 appeared and filed an objection on 05.04.2012. However, thereafter, he kept on disappearing frequently, which led the learned trial court to pass order dated 27.02.2020 whereby the application seeking interim maintenance, which was moved by the revisionist, came to be allowed. The opposite party No.1 moved an application dated 24.08.2022 to get the same recalled on the ground that the same was passed ex parte. The opposite party No.1 was not afforded opportunity of hearing while passing the aforesaid order. It appears that vide impugned order dated 16.02.2023, the learned trial court allowed application dated 24.08.2022, which was moved by opposite party No.1 and set aside the order dated 27.02.2020 on payment of cost Rs.2,000/- and fixed another date for disposal of application No.31A.
