Smt. Namita Saxena v. the State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application u/s 482 dismissed for want of prosecution as counsel for the applicant had no instructions on the date of hearing.
Application u/s 482 dismissed for want of prosecution as counsel for the applicant had no instructions on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:43870
Court No. - 28
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3413 of 2013
Applicant :- Smt. Namita Saxena Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Nadeem Murtaza Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Rajesh Kumar,V K Shahi
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
The matter pertains to the year 2013.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has no instructions in the matter.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Consign to the records.
Order Date :- 7.7.2023 Ram Murti
Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Namita Saxena
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court