The single-line order disposes of Writ Petition No. 259 of 2023, leaving the petitioners open to avail other remedies, without an expressed outcome on the core legal controversy.
Writ petition disposed; petitioners directed to avail other remedies if available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 259 of 2023
Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar,Manish Mani Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 to 6, Mohd. Waris Farooqui, Advocate who files his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 7 and Sri Ravindra Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 8.
Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing at some length prays that the instant writ petition may be disposed of leaving it open to the petitioners to avail other remedies as may be available to them.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in above terms.
Order Date :- 13.1.2023 Pachhere/-
Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shiv Kumar
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
