Munna v. the State of U.P and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In Application U/S 482 CrPC, the Allahabad High Court dismissed the application as infructuous due to the efflux of time and vacated any interim orders.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:71884
Court No. - 28
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1579 of 2014
Applicant :- Munna Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Shravan Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
- This Case is listed under the head of 'Cases not to be adjourned'.
- Case called out. None present for applicant.
- Sri Aniruddha Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State is present.
- It seems that by efflux of time, matter has become infructuous.
- The application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
- Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Munna
- respondent
The State Of U.P And Anr
Coram
Prakash Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- /1579/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court