Disposed

Mahendra @ Guddu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Jul 2023/1181/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court disposed of a criminal appeal by directing the trial court to decide the appellant's bail application based on the legal principles laid down in Satender Kumar Antil Supreme Court judgments if he appears and applies within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Direction given to trial court to decide bail application based on Satender Kumar Antil judgments if appellant appears within 15 days.

Mahendra @ Guddu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:46438

¶2

Court No. - 29

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1181 of 2023

¶4

Appellant :- Mahendra @ Guddu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Jagdeep Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Om Chandra Sahu

¶5

Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for appellant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record of the case.

¶7

Instant criminal appeal has been filed under Section 14(A)(1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, against the summoning order dated 11.10.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Lucknow arising out of Case Crime No. 567 of 2019 under Sections 406, 504, 506 IPC and 3(1) DHA, SC/ST Act Police Station Kakori, District Lucknow as well as Charge sheet No. 1 dated 16.05.2021 as well as entire proceedings in Crime Case SPT No. 2090 of 2022.

¶8

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he does not want to press the prayer made in the appeal. He confines his prayer only to the extent that a direction be given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicant in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation , reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773 and Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and others MANU/SC/0851/2022 .

¶9

Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for respondent No. 2 have no objection, if such a direction is given to the court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicant in the light of the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶10

Accordingly, it is directed that if appellant appears before the trial court within 15 days from today and apply for bail then, his bail application shall be decided by the court below on the basis of law laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of Satender Kumar Antil (supras) .

¶11

With these direction/observation, the present appeal is finally disposed of .

¶12

(Renu Agarwal,J.)

¶13

Order Date :- 17.7.2023

¶14

Nadeem

¶15

Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mahendra @ Guddu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra @ Guddu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajiv Bajpai Vs State of U.P. and Another

Virendra Singh @ Virendra Pratap Singh @ Babbu Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and Another

Kaushal Kumar Singh @ Bunty Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Shiv Prakash @ Nanhakke Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Jitendra Kumar Singh (According to Prosecution Jitendra Kumar, Ward Boy) Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another