Sandip v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a bail application as infructuous after the status report indicated that the criminal trial had already been concluded.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous upon conclusion of trial.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:47589
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1115 of 2019
Applicant :- Sandip Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Akash Dikshit Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. In terms of the order dated 13.07.2023, the status report of the trial was called for.
2 . The report indicates that the trial has already been concluded, as such, the bail application has become infructuous.
3 . It is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.7.2023 akverma
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail prayer remains maintainable after the trial has concluded.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sandip
Coram
Pankaj Bhatia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- /1115/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vikrama Prasad Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Civil Secrt. Lko.
Govind Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Additional Chief Secy. Home, Lko and Others
Ashfak Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others
Sageer Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrett. Lko. and 3 Others