This application sought withdrawal of a criminal revision. The High Court, after examining the cause shown, allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the revision as withdrawn.
Application for withdrawal of criminal revision allowed; revision dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:83520
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 105 of 2022
Revisionist :- Om Prakash Pal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Nandini Gupta,Gargi Prakash Misra,Sunita Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. (I.A./04/2023) Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
(I.A./04/2023)
(Order on Revision)
Order Date :- 18.12.2023 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Om Prakash Pal
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
