The writ petition by Anil Kumar was dismissed for want of prosecution after the petitioners failed to comply with a direction to file better age proof despite being granted extended time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7424 of 2022
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hanuman Prasad Kushwaha,Vinay Kumar Bharti Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
List revised. None appears for the petitioners to press this petition.
The order sheet reveals that vide order dated 8.4.2022, the petitioners were directed to file better age proof but the order has not been complied with though further time was grated vide order dated 9.5.2022.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.8.2022 Rahul Dwivedi/-
Digitally signed by RAHUL DWIVEDI Date: 2022.08.23 16:54:33 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anil Kumar And Another
State Of U P And 3 Others
Piyush Agrawal
Rahul Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
