The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner deposited damages, execution fee, and vacated the Gram Panchayat's land.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7033 of 2007
Petitioner :- Prem Singh Respondent :- District Magistrate Saharanpur District And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jagdish Prasad Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anuj Kumar
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.
Heard Sri Jagdish Prasad Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
According to the petitioner's counsel the matter has become infructuous.
Hence, the petition is dismissed as infructuous, as the petitioner has deposited the damages amount and execution fee and has also vacated the land of Gram Panchayat.
If the orders of the lower court are not complied with, the same may be executed.
Order Date :- 16.12.2022
Vinod.
Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR JAISWAL Date: 2022.12.17 14:36:46 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Prem Singh
District Magistrate Saharanpur District And Others
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
