The High Court dismissed the writ petition in default as the petitioner did not appear to argue the matter nor seek an adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 22
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 569 of 2016
Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Modanwal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Sultanpur Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case has been called in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition nor there is any request for adjournment or pass over of the case.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 14.9.2022 S. Kumar
Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR Date: 2022.09.15 15:20:12 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Dinesh Kumar Modanwal
State Of U.P.
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
