The petitioner filed a writ petition. The single judge held that a prior order in Writ - C No. 15644 of 2021 had already addressed the fate of the present matter, rendering it infructuous and accordingly dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5634 of 2022
Petitioner :- Hodil Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Singh,Sunil Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Misra
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 8.4.2022 Abhilash
Digitally signed by ABHILASH SINGH Date: 2022.04.08 18:14:30 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Sri Hodil Singh & Anr.Referred¶6
Writ - C No. 15644 of 2021 (Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Sri Hodil Singh & Anr.)
Hodil Singh
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
