The petitioner failed to appear despite a revised call for the hearing date. The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, and the interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4595 of 2010
Petitioner :- Nizam Khan Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,D.D. Chauhan
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears for the petitioner to press the writ petition even in the revised call.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 9.9.2022 PK
(Vikas Budhwar,J.).......(Siddhartha Varma,J.)
Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR Date: 2022.09.12 10:57:28 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nizam Khan
State of U.P.
Siddhartha Varma
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
