Smt. Pooja Pal and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This High Court, in a writ petition, dismissed the application as having become infructuous due to the non-appearance of the petitioner and the efflux of time.
This High Court, in a writ petition, dismissed the application as having become infructuous due to the non-appearance of the petitioner and the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 82
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4396 of 2022
Petitioner :- Smt. Pooja Pal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Neither anyone appears nor any document with regard to the proof of age of petitioners has been filed.However, learned A.C.S.C. is present.
It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action is no more surviving or for any other reason matter has rendered infructuous and that is why none is present to press this petition.
In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 28.4.2022
MN/-
Digitally signed by MAHENDRA NATH Date: 2022.05.04 10:26:10 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Pooja Pal And Another
State Of U.P.
Umesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court